That person is a success who has lived well,
Ralph Waldo Emerson
My friend, I will miss you so very much,
Purple lined velvet capes, a fondness for formal wear and bow ties, Eye-liner, and Super slick hair - And despite all these obvious similarities between gay men and vampires - the National Blood Service in the UK have always given the homosexual community a very wide birth.
There's a campaign going on to have the blood donor regulations changed, to remove the discrimination of homosexuals and bisexuals. As it stands, in the UK, any man who's engaged in homosexual relations, or any woman who's had sex with a man who has, can not give blood. The reason being, these people are more likely to be HIV positive, which would infect others with the virus.
Italy, South Africa, Sweden, Spain, Portugal, Russia and France all used to have the same law, but in each of those countries, the law has been repealed.
But just because other nations think the reasons are invalid, should we believe them and follow suit? As a spokesperson from the NBS (National Blood Service) said:
| “We have had these policies in place for many years in order to maximise blood safety. All our blood is tested for HIV but no test is 100 per cent. This isn’t about discrimination, our policies are constantly reviewed to ensure blood supply is maintained and kept safe.” |
Is this true? It is the official policy, but that was a policy set a long time ago, when people thought AIDS was a gay disease. Most of us know better now - and because of the intense education in the gay media about HIV & AIDS, the rate of infection in the gay community has been significantly reduced, a trend which has only in recent years followed for heterosexuals as stigma of the disease has dropped too.
Let's take a quick look around the world and examine some stats...
From the US:
| Women now account for 43% of all HIV infected people over the age of 15 |
In Korea, where AIDS is a serious problem (if it can ever said to be not one at all):
| ...the reasons for disease contraction were found for 3,222 of all patients. Among them, 1,377 contracted HIV through sexual intercourse with the same sex while 1,801 contracted the disease through heterosexual relations. |
And in the UK:
| The number of heterosexually acquired HIV infections diagnosed in the UK has risen hugely over the last 15 years. In 1999, for the first time, the rate of heterosexually acquired HIV diagnoses overtook the rate of diagnoses in men who have sex with men. During 2005, there were 3,839 reports of heterosexually acquired HIV, and a total of 32,361 had been reported by the end of June 2006. Many of the new diagnoses are in people who probably acquired HIV in other countries. However, the number of infections probably acquired from heterosexual sex within the UK has soared from 180 in 1998 to 521 in 2005. |
In fact, if we're targeting sexual activity in the screening process... and that's not an unreasonable thing to do, there is only one line of questioning we really need, and it's not sexuality. The questions need to be aimed at asking what kind of sex life this person has – is it careful or not? With whom do they have sex? As for the ban on gay men giving blood? It does a lot more harm than good, if any good at all.
We've learnt a lot more about HIV, so let’s bring the laws into the right century, and take effective measures to prevent it's spread. While we're at it, it wouldn't hurt if we all individually learnt a little more about HIV and AIDS, especially at this time as we fast approach World AIDS day. It's time to lift the prejudice of HIV.
To sign the petition on the blood ban, go to: http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/bloodban/
To learn more about AIDS and World AIDS day, I'll pass you on to: http://www.worldaidsday.org/
__
Phil
[1] New York Times, 11/98
[2] The Korea Times: Based on data collected by the Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC)
[3] Avert: UK Summary
If you could have a starship... you know - find one (or a way to one) that no-one new about in an underground cavern by some crazy series of events tomorrow afternoon or something... what would you want it to be like?
There's the small crafts, like X-Wings, Tie Fighters (Star Wars), Shuttle Crafts , (wokbee?), Star Fighters (Star Trek) and so on. You might go so far as to include runabouts and Raiders... nah - we'll put them in the next group. These small one or two man ships are usually short - mid range, relatively low top speeds. They can fly in atmospheres and space, easy to find a parking space or hide away, and of course - they mostly look cool. Usually built to one purpose (fighting/scouting/bombing/ferrying) you'd have to pick from the range carefully - but you'll be independent, and get good miles to the gallon.
Next up, your small freighters. Serenity (Firefly/Serenity), The Millenium Falcon (SW), Starbug (Red Dwarf), we said we'd put runabouts and raiders (ST) in here. D-12's would go in here too (the really small Klingon Bird of Prey's - ST). These things usually have a bit of character to them. Rickety barges, these ships can be crewed by a handful of people and host many more in emergencies. They're a little more adaptive in their purpose but still not really covering every base. Needing a crew, you're not so independent as such, but the crew as a whole don't need much in the way of supporting infrastructure so you wont exactly be tied down either. Atmospheric flight and longer range/higher speeds - you still wont be beating the larger vessels for raw power but you can boast of your tweaked focused performance areas. Good for freight and long term adventure - you have to know your limits, but these things can be a lot of fun. Oh, and if you're not into slumming it on the Serenity or Falcon - Star Trek brings you the Nova, which brings you a nice clean feel option to this size class.
Now we're getting into the big boys. The Defiant (ST) can be staffed with a crew of 50, but there's not much leeway on that number. Tactical Small Cruisers, Large Freighters - the Voyager (ST) is probably at the larger end of this group and in between you have the Klingon K'Vorts (ST), Corellian Corvette's (SW) and... okay I'm not really sure of that many ships in this class. Quite a lot of Trek options but I'll need help to name ships outside that verse.
They're geared to particular function but they don't do to bad at covering all the bases. Those geared for combat are fast and punchy, usually way overpowered for their size and built to live fast die young. Do the damage - survive if it's convenient but make sure you do the damage. The freighters in this class have massive storage capacity for planetary scale deliveries. The exploration vessels are disgned for fast efficient long range travel and everything people need to be self sustaining for several years if need be. They do need maintaining though - of the kind that a handful of people can't provide, and you *will* need a proper crew to get it to even move. They can be fast, and while they can't sustain very high speeds over long distances, they have decent cruise velocities. (And these often look damn sexy too).
For those of you who aren't looking for the weekend away or gap year options - and if you have a few hundred friends on your MySpace tally - you might consider a real Starship.
This becomes a lifestyle - it's huge community ship. Battlestar Galactica (BSG), The Enterprise (ST - if you know to ask which one, you know the answers yourself), Star Destroyers (SW), Red Dwarf (RD), and the Alliance Cruisers (FF/S). These things are cities in space - they do everything from schooling and restaurants to battle and research. You *need* a large crew, regular services, a secure fuel source and much more - owning one of these things is no walk in the park - but you do rule the stars. No where's too far, no where's unreachable. If you want to stare down a space monster or the fleet of hostile patrol/scouting ships - this is the thing you're going to need. Holodecks, spacious quarters, and power. Yup - there's definitely an attraction to being a player in this league, but it'll come with a price of some responsibilities and a need for many many others.
Me... I think I'd like the Defiant, the K'Vorts... that sort of thing. One that can handle atmospheres and cloaking would be a great feature to have. Having said that... needing 50-100 people to make it usable is just inconvenient. I'm going to cheat! I want the voyager, with a Delta Flyer style shuttle - for those times you need to just nip out to the shops on your own.
__
Phil
P.S. I love star ships :-D Go on... geek out!