"I may not agree with what you say..."

"... but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

 

Ok, in fairness I'm probably not willing to die for this cause... but I'm willing to make a blog post about it at least, and that's something eh?

 

Catholic adoption agencies have threatened to shut down if they are not made exempt from the sexual orientation discrimination laws.

I've been known to say the Salvation Army should just pull it's services where the government are making unfair demands.  It's a constant tension between putting up with rules and regulations that cost you, make things harder, and that you simply may oppose, against the desire to help those you're really trying to provide the service for.  In this case, the Roman Catholic church want to help orphans, but at the same time, wont place a child in a homosexual couple household.  The latter would strongly conflict with their beliefs, but if they play hard ball, it may well be the orphans that suffer.

 

To start off with, I think the Catholic position on 'no gay adoption' is wrong, and that homosexual couples should continue to be able to adopt.  I'm not saying I support their decision, but I do respect their opinion, and think as they're providing a service, they shouldn't be forced to go against their beliefs to do it.
They're not aggressively opposing gay adoption - they're not directly suggesting that is should be made illegal (not in this case at least).  Having accepted the state will allow it, and that it's not their decision to say otherwise, they are only asking that they not be forced to assist, that their religious beliefs be held with the same level of respect as other peoples social beliefs.  This is a conflict not easily resolved by all.  But in this case, there's room.  This would be a valid application for exception.  *This* is the sort of thing I get really quite mad a those fundamentalist evangelical nutters who gathered outside the Lords last week, who've destroyed most good chance groups like the Catholic Adoption services have of being treated as reasonable people.

 

I hope this case is considered, and that the children are considered by both sides.  I realise the church can't go around flexing it's muscles to bend parliament to it's will, but likewise, for the state to do the reverse is over the line, and more than a fight, this needs to be an understanding, adult agreement. 

 

For my contribution to the level of maturity in this debate, I'm going to step up my 'suppress fundamentalist morons' campaign and start ear flicking stupid people if they suggest something like a protest.
Catholics - you can thank me later.
__

Phil

Operation 'PEACEMEAL'

Every now and then, I'm awake in the morning while the birds are still singing their tunes, and the HGV's are still taking shortcuts through the suburbs before the commuters come to gridlock those small open roads.

On such glorious mornings as these, I like to have a leisurely breakfast at José’s café.

Little did I know, stepping through the understated gateway into this hallowed hall of purest coffee and fry ups, that today the dynamics of staff and customer would forever change.  A bit.

José... Or whatever his name is took my order as normal, penning down a list of indistinguishable marks as I specified my breakfast content. Now normally, his faithful wife would be leaning past the partition eager to take the order and begin the process that ultimately leads to my contented stomach, but today, she stood at the far end of the kitchen, scowling through the hatch.
José continued with his routine though, making my foam topped cappuccino and smothering the soft white peak with chocolate powder, offering the caffeine loaded cup across the counter and gesturing me to sit.  I took a table and looked up, noticing my order was still on the front counter.  José turned to speak to the woman lurking in the back, waving my ticket at her with a despairing tone. She was quick to reply, showing unusual dislike for the jolly café host, and while I could not understand the language, gun to head, I’d guess she said "Well how am I meant to make it if you don't *pass* me the ticket? I'm not physic!"

What a change though eh? Until today, these people who'd made my breakfasts for over 2 years had simply been bacon vending machines to my dull, sleepy, morning ritual. But here they were - undeniably real people with passion and everything! More importantly, what a crisis! My order was still in José’s hand, and I wasn't getting any fuller. The situation was out of control - the crisis had spread to involving my very state of nutrition. Was I to starve over the Great War off José’s café? Collateral damage in a senseless conflict. No, I must intervene. Like a UN task force, I had to break my uninvolved position and act to bring peace between these two great powers so that the stability of the wider café could be restored.

Operation 'PEACEMEAL' was about to whirl into action. I'd first find an entry point - some trivial unguarded conversation piece that I could casually drop in, ideally something in the vicinity of harmony or love, so I might quickly go on to make a unifying sweep across both fronts, employing the 'Personal and sincere compliment' tactic, reminding the duo in a two step conversation what a great team they make, and belittling their troubling fall out problems under a greater purpose.

The plan didn't quite execute like it did in my head, turning out as more or a smile with raised brow, accompanied by a slight nod... possibly there was a murmur of some kind too, but otherwise failing to develop into words. As it happened, they returned the wry smile and nod, stopping their argument to proceed with making my breakfast. So ok... No great peace making... But it did get my hunger back on the priority table at least... so a partial victory right?

 

The fry up was great.  The coffee excellent. And off I went to the office. 

Just to think though - I could have been their champion of peace, breaking through the week on week of silence that coated our irregular contact.  I could have become part of those peoples lives, become real to them, shared in their stories and learnt of their lives. 

 

Ah well.  

 

Maybe tomorrow.
__

Phil

iPhone

I know the iPhone is like.. so last week - but I've been busy, and besides... it's taken me this long to figure out my opinions on it. For those of you who've not heard of it - here's my take...

-----------------------------------------

I... just... don't know what I think about the iPhone. On the one hand, I have a natural slant against the Mac grain. But on the other I recognise they do make some top quality gadgets. Some of the services offered with the iPhone are really cool, but some of functions.. I just wonder if they'll work at all for real people.

What winds me up a bit is people thinking this device is ground breakingly new because it's got everything in one and it's a touch screen and all that jazz. This statement is a good example:

"The phone includes Mac OS X, making it the first mobile device to run an operating system. It uses Safari as its browser and is compatible with any IMAP or POP3 e-mail services. Yahoo will forward your e-mails to your iPhone for free!
Jobs said that the iPhone used software that was at least five years ahead of any phone, and there seemed not a soul in the room who didn't agree.
"We have reinvented the phone," Jobs said, and we all nodded in unison.
Oh, and did I mention? The iPhone also a 2 megapixel camera."
...
"A few questions were left unanswered, such as whether the iPhone ran Microsoft Word, and whether the new product's surface would scratch, a flaw that plagued the first generation of iPod Nanos.
But the product was so breathtaking in all aspects and included so many features never seen before in one digital mobile device that all seemed to be ignored or forgiven for the time being."

First phone to run an OS? First up.. pretty much every phone runs an OS. Secondly, I've been using phones with desktop style OS's for coming on 3 years now, and mine wasn't the first by quite a way. This is not new. Niether are phones with all those protocols or having emails sent to your mobile. It's been in common use for years. And a 2 megapixel camera?

Some people have said to me, 'It plays video! A phone you can watch DVD's on!'

But you can't blame Apple for playing the plebes. It's gotta be done and they do it well - it certainly doesn't take away from the fact that it is a very nice gadget. To avoid backlash from the geeks, and even MacGeeks can't fail to notice there's very little new technology being presented here, Steve's been careful to use words, however ambigious and hidden in the tone, that he's talking only about some of the software when he speaks of the 5 years jump. Again, it's not his fault the press have taken the revolutionary software bits, and immediately after, continued the list with fairly available technology without adding a line break in, making it look like Apple just invented mobile internet connections and touch screens.

Let's get to it. The iPhone.

It's smart. I'm told it knows when you've made a spelling mistakes and corrects it for you in txts and other typing scenarios. It detects when your face is aginst it and shuts down the screen so you don't hang up mid call by brushing your cheek in the wrong place. It adjusts it's operations to what your doing to save on battery power. It knows when you've touched the screen but didn't mean to press there, and ignores you.
If this all works - I'm very impressed and it's great to see them lifting the bar on mobile interface technology. If it doesn't work as flawlessly as claimed - it's going to be pretty damn annoying.

It's sleak. It's the thinest PDA out there. 11mm or so? My XDA wasn't much more than that, and I'm pretty sure the Pearl was thiner and techincally has PDA functionality, though I'm happy not to count it as one. But it's thin. It's not small. It's a large pannel. My SPV M3100 is a lot smaller by height and width, only thicker by depth. It's a way thicker in fact, but I still recon it's easier to fit into small pockets, and more importantly, get out of your small pocket when you hear a call. And don't say buy big pocketed trousers - that's not where the solution should lie.

But the iPhone looks smooth, and because it makes good use of the screen for viedo play - I'm happy that it's the size it is.

It's all touch screen. No (at least, very few) buttons. This is cool, and looks great. I'm not sure I like it though. I'm thinking about the real world for a moment and thinking... I put this in my big pocket and realise my keys are in there too - the poor thing wont stand a chance of not being scratched, which for a touch screen is not a good thing. So you put a case on it... but then... it's a lot thicker all of a sudden and looks nowhere near as cool. I'm just trying to think realisticly about the device. I've been using PDA Phones for years and I know how they fit into your life, I know the day to day quirks of use. Sticking to buttons for just a minute, a few nights ago I got a call late at night. I'd already gone to bed, and was able to answer the phone without even opening my eyes. Why? Because I can feel the answer button. Same reason I can return a call without taking my phone out of it's sleeve (using the hands free to talk through). Physical buttons aren't bad. There's a place for them I think.

I can also use my phone with my gloves on (both the buttons and the screen actually). It's winter. I wrap up when I go out. It's very cold and very very windy here today. Should I be an iPhone user I would not remove my glove to start or skip a track as I walk down the street. And answering a call for that matter - I don't want to have to remove my glove on an icy cold day to answer a call. I'm just thinking - these are my day to day experiences of phone usage, and they're issues. The iPhone is great if I was always at my desk or in a nice environement, but I go outside from time to time and that's what a mobile is for.
I also don't need the computer to decide what it thinks I'm trying to say, because my keyboard works with my nails, which the iPhone presumably wont. The mini keyboard on my SPV is great - I don't know what the line 'No more annoying little keyboards' is refering to. Perhaps thumb boards - they are annoying. With PDA phones, you type with your thumbs, and my thumbs are larger than Steve Job's it would seem. I worry anyone who doesn't have small thumbs will find it less accurate. specifically on the iPhone you have to use the flat of your thumb, and there's no way you can hit the right key on that touchscreen with any accuracy. So it looks at the cluster of letters you pressed, assigns weighted liklihood to each potential target based on distance from centre, and then looks at what the word could be so far, adding more weighting to the selection before picking the one with the highest percent. It may be far more clever - it might learn you're typical touch offset and vocab.
This is not what I'd call 5 years ahead if that's all it is. It's a problem no-one's (actually I bet someone has, but no major company) bothered to solve because it's a problem that keyboards don't have anyway... and it is at most, a week ahead, not 5 years. But if it works - I do like it.

160dpi. Now this is nice. It's a very high resolution screen for very sharp images.

Multi-Touch. Here we go! This is the coolness now. Nothing bad to say about this at all. Using two fingers, the actions you make in unison signal different commands. It's something Mac already uses to limited extents else where and very few other people do - it's easy, responsive, and proportionate control. By putting this out there, it raises the bar for other touch screen devices. Again, it's not a leap into the future but something from the recent past being used well.

4GB - 8GB Storage Space. Nice. Again, not something of the magical distant future - any other company can do this at will - but nice. If it had a slot for some kind of SD too, allowing you to add 2-4GB swapable cards in at will like my current all in one mobile does... then that'd be great. It'd be an especially good addition to the 4GB model, which as it stands, no-one should ever ever ever buy. Ever. Don't be stupid. Get the 8GB model. Trust me on that. Just pay the little more and get it. Good.

Swooshy Sounds and Floaty Motions. Not to be made fun of! This is important too. It's all about having a nice user experience - decreases stress with the mistakes (not that any can happen on apple interfaces) and makes you feel like the device is really part of you.

Third Party App's. Oh dear oh dear oh dear. This is where it all falls down for me. Up till now, the iPhone is every other all-in-1's equal, with a lot of polish and some nice bonus features. Up till now, I'd dare say although reporters are stupid, and nothing here is all that new - it is still the best example of this device type. And then... they ruin it. This even turns a lot of Mac fans off. Apple have made it clear they do not intend to allow software to be loaded onto the device, that was made by a 3rd party (not Apple). The reason? Same old reason Apple always have for this kind of rule - they want their reputation to be 'It never crashes!'. Indeed you better hope it doesn't, as without a stylus I'm guessing resetting it isn't as simple as pressing a button. But they want the forums on the net to be full of smug people saying 'It's never crashed - it's perfect!' like they did with the old iMacs. And they'll succeed. The main reason crashes occur is conflicts. Unexpected conflicts between programs that weren't expected to run at the same time as another unknown program, or programs that weren't tested enough under all conditions. To solve this, they ban all unknown factors, much like saying, 'We hope you enjoy our 100% ultra safe swiss army pen knife. We pride ourselves on the reputation that no-one has ever cut their finger with this product. Please note all sharp features of the unit, while remaining present for asthetic value, have sealed shut. Enjoy your £300 nale file. Jack ass.'

But then - they're not after me I guess. They're not after the people who say 'I just want it to make calls', nor the people who say 'My phone is like a full PC! Last night I added a cool app that makes...". They're after the people who want a cool phone, that can play videos and music, but don't want to have much else on the one device. It's the high end mobile users who are just about ready for a bit more than their camera phone. I'd say there's a significant market for that - and in such a catagory, the iPhone is without doubt the best.
Meanwhile, I'm eagerly waiting on the SPV manufacturers to integrate a few of these cool features (the multi-touch and the 8GB storage especially), and upgrade as soon as they do.
__
Phil

CORRECTION: Order of the Consoles

It's been brought to my attention that Sony haven't yet hit the 1'000'000 mark in the sense that I was meaning.  When I used the word 'sold' I should have used 'shipped'.  It's believed that Sony had not breached a million PS3's into consumer households by New Years.  It's a shakey start for the Consumer Electronics giant.

Order of the Consoles

This is slightly late news... was more yesterday and I haven't been on the net since writing it but... I wrote it so... it's getting published :-P

...

OOTS has been awesome lately. I'm really enjoying the Elan-centric plot and the action sequences. Bard's rock.

In other news, Sony have announced again that it is *they* who have won the console war.

To recap, MSN News reported the 360 was Master of All at the end of November, based on two key figures:

a) There were more 360's sold World Wide than Wii's and PS3's put together.
b) The 360 had sold in greater number even exclusively looking at November sales.

'a' was due to their being 360's available for about 12 months already, though I found 'b' genuinely surprising. Still, at that stage of the game it was perhaps a little early to call victory.

After Christmas sales came and went, Sony announced they'd won, because while there were a little over 10 million 360's sold, and about 4 million Wii's sold, Sony had sold over 110 million units. Yup - a clear victory. This seems like a remarkable jump until you spot that this was not a claim of PS3 success, but of PS2 success. That's right, Sony publicly announced their own previous generation console beat their new one. I don't understand what the point of that announcement was - the PS2's success is well known without needing to remind us, but the PS2 is not a contender in generations line up. Having said that, it wasn't entirely off topic - they point out that the PS2 is still so popular that it sold better even in the last 2 months than any other console, shipping over 14 million units. With regards to it's popularity over it's younger cousin the PS3, it's probably due to there being games available for it, which so far seems to be a weak point of the Blue-Ray HD super machine.

But how's the PS3 doing? Well that'd bring us up to date, with today's news sprinkling 'PS3s massive success' over my homepage. A little reading and I discover Sony have sold 1 million consoles in the US, and tell us the PS3 has reached this figure faster than the PS2 did, thus, will sell better than even the PS2 in the long term.

I'm.. not sure how they apply that logic without noting the PS3 was still outsold by everything else, leading us to ask... will all the others not therefore sell better too? I also doubt the PS2 fell short of a million units by it's first Christmas sales due to anything other than a late release in the season and massive understocking on Sony's behalf.

This doesn't mean the PS3 is not going to win, but it's a joke to claim it's even near the lead just yet. It feels like a desperation cry more than anything else, and I'm pretty sure Sony's target by New Years was meant to be 2 million. In March, Sony open the PS3 to Europe, after which they expect to hit the 6 million mark. Now... if the US reaches 1 million... I'm thinking the EU... on an even later release... having by then had the 360 for a year and a half... will have less sales. And even if it does sell well - we're aiming to sell 115 million in 5 years to claim the same market share as the PS2 did. Is the low sales purely due to understocking? If Sony put 50 million units in stores tomorrow would they all be snapped up? Speaking of all being snapped up, what I don't understand is why I know lots of people who've bought a next gen console, but the sales figures are less than 10% of previous gen sales across the board. Some weird maths going on here. Maybe Europe do by the lions share of the games consoles. *shrugs*

Moving from the US, Japan has had all 3 consoles for a while now too. In the last generation, the X-Box made almost no appearance in the market - Sony and Nintendo shared dominance of the island. This time round, the 360 has put its foot in the door - while only capturing a small market share, it's massively siginificant for Microsoft to even have one, and while I don't think it will massively grow, it should make for an easier PR battle in the next generation - until now, the US developed console has lacked familiarity to the consumers over there.

Any of you guys bought a next gen console?  Think the PS3's a sure bet still?
__
Phil

Neo-Philism: 'Impractical Policies... idealised'

This is very much from the chool of 'thinking out loud'.  Kel and I were chatting it over and I thought it intersting enough to share for wider comments.  Here goes...

It stems from two social issues. The first is the pro’s and con’s of national service. There was debate some time ago about the value of national service, in the wake of the TV program ‘Bad Lads Army’. There was even political attention given because the program had showed some ASBO-culture young guys turned into… well… better trained ASBO-culture young guys. And indeed, some ‘turned their lives around’ in a pretty cool way, so I’m not going to slag it off, but anyway – it brought national service to the attention of the public as a possible cure for our declining society values, etc, etc.

From time to time, I’m privy to information about the governments’ responses and initiatives that don’t make it into the press, just because I work with organisations that are consulted in think tanks and research stages of policy. Around this time, I heard the opinion was National service would be too unpopular as a policy, and that it was perhaps a step backwards in our social evolution, not to mention a risk to the very good reputation our military has for being consistently one of the most professional armed forces in the world (because… it’s not conscript – it’s… well, professional). But plans were not scrapped altogether. Talks moved on to a national service system, where military would be one of many options, including large programmes for community work. When you leave school/college, you spend X years minimum doing some kind of low paid service to your nation akin to voluntary work. It gives a sense of equal ownership and community to everyone right at the start of adult life, and would hold many of the benefits of the old style national service regarding discipline and community pride, as well as getting people into a working attitude that could go a long way to reducing long term unemployment.

I’ve heard little about this since, and my guess is somewhere along the talks the impracticalities started working their way into the spotlight, and perhaps the suggestion that ASBO culture is something that needs to be tackled long before the end of school/collage and by this point, the system wouldn’t be strong enough to actually work for anyone but those who would have been keen to seek career paths/further education anyway, effectively just slowing them down. I dunno. But I do hope it’s not a dead debate – cos I think there’s definitely something of value in some kind of ‘national service’, and it’s prolly time to try something out for the sake of avoiding more panicked policies in a few years time.

The second thing was derived quite separately, but links in rather neatly I think.
I was thinking, maybe we should just end unemployment. I hear people talking about unemployment as an issue. Unemployment figures being high is a negative thing. Very few people… if any, speak of unemployment as a good thing. People who are unemployed also view it with negativity, and it’s a leading cause of depression. So… why have it? We spend a lot of money on sustaining unemployment and if no-one wants it, it seems ludicrous to do that.
Why do we have unemployment?

Before I get into that – I need to separate two very different parts of unemployment. The benefit system is a massively good and important thing – making provision for those who are unable to provide for themselves due to any given long or short term situation. It is however, a hideous system that has been strung together in an adhoc piggledy mash of red tape and loop holes, resulting in a) it’s severe abuse by those people who know the system well enough when they don’t require it as fully as they take from it, and b) it utterly fails the people who really need it, because they don’t know how to work it. The benefit system may have once worked, but the addition and modifications over the years have left it disorganised and unfair. It needs to be rethought out from ground and made to actually work for the people it should work for. It should also have a strong focus on making every provision possible to bringing people who struggle into a contributing job in whatever way they can offer, because there’s a massive issue of dignity to these people who really want to make their difference in the world too.

That leaves the rest of unemployment, which is not benefit related. I suppose then this is caused by there not being enough jobs. This may or may not be true – I’d go with… it’s true. There certainly aren’t enough appropriate jobs for the number of qualified people in a lot of fields, and so people wait for one to come up, becoming frustrated while they do. In any case, this isn’t a good reason to have ‘unemployment’. In a country where there is a lot of tings socially lacking, seems to me ‘dole’ could be replaced with some default government employment system. If you sign on for money, you must select a job form the bank of very generic and helpful roles of jobs, quite similar if not the same thing as the before mentioned new national service system. For these jobs, you’d get the same money you get now for being unemployed. There’ll be a wide variety of rewarding and unquantifiable beneficial jobs to choose from, ranging from the classic military, to things as simple as riding busses in two’s or three’s just to monitor and prevent anti-social behaviour on them and stop making bus drivers have to deal with everything on their own all the time. It could mean cleaning up an area, running community centres and activities, talking to people in hospitals and delivering meals on wheels. The list goes on – there’s no end to the positions that could be created under the occupation of ‘national citizen’ or whatever. And these roles making life better for everyone, as well as giving job seekers a sense of contribution and worth, will very quickly drop the stigma associated with ‘unemployment’ as well.

Part time national employment with job seekers would involve 3 days working a chosen job, and 2 days left free for job seeking, along with help given to improve CV and job hunting skills. This would be assigned a salary similar to that of the current unemployment benefit.
Part time national employment with training would be for those who aren’t able to get a job because they aren’t educated enough and need vocational or basic education. This would be 2 days working a selected job and 3 days appropriate training, and again, salary equivalent to current job seekers.
Full time national employment would be 5 days employment, and is for those who want to make community work their career path – and would allow for a scaling salary as they climb the ladder of a whole new department of society that would I guess be a sister to the Civil Service, which brings a stable element to what would otherwise be a very unpredictable work force making long term project management difficult. Also, allowing for a full time option (just like the earlier mentioned national service would be in fact) would also further remove any stigma we have towards this kind of system – it’s an honourable and valuable work – society and community is important stuff. It wouldn’t even be really creating a new department on the higher levels – the system could be fed into existing public sector departments.

And the cost of this? Well… it’s not much more than what unemployment costs us anyway, but adds huge social and personal benefits to all. Again… why have unemployment?

Aggressive Stupidity II

This weekend was Mark’s funeral. It was really hard, but everyone was there, and the whole day was about celebrating his life and glorifying God together, which helped a lot. I’ve never known a person die so gracefully and fearlessly as Mark, right up to the end he was faithful and never once, not once, asked why him, or uttered a word of complaint. An amazing man.

The rest of the weekend involved spending time with friends and family, including my nephews Birthday party, time with Kel, an evening with some uni CU people, and a late night chatting with Caleb.

Now this was an extremely varied group of activities to put in one day. Children’s Birthday parties are crazy things, but once you’ve accepted the madness you can get through it with maybe even a little fun along the way.

Time with Kel was spent catching up and explaining plans of vast social revolution.
I’ll make a separate blog about that I think.

Time with CU people was… well, complicated. I had fun – it was a good evening in itself, but I’m very worried about some of them really, I was a little dumbstruck by the lacking of friendliness and common decency that I’d expect in anyone, Christian or otherwise (this wasn't much towards me might I add – I was made most welcome, but that doesn’t make it any better).
I don’t want to air the dirty laundry in front of everyone so I’m not going into any more detail about that, but this is something heavily on my mind and it’s a challenge to all of us I think – we all lose a grip on our attitudes towards each other without realising. Heaven knows I’m not the guy to go around rebuking people, but I say this with a lot of self reflection in mind too. You have to be loving, forgiving, and full of grace. There’s no excuse for exclusion. It’s not often I sit in a room of Christians and even accepting conservative Christian terms (simultaneously on moderate and liberal grounds too), feel I can take a very large share of moral high ground with my life, and it’s disturbing when I can but it’s how I felt on that night. I guess that’s why it freaked me out so much as I'm not used to being in that position.  Sort out the rejection policies guys - no excuses for them.

It also particularly shone out to me as the evening had begun on the train with a pointed warm up to a debate on how Liberal thinkers are a great danger and should stop misleading the sheep of the church (or at least if they’re charismatic they should – if they’re inarticulate they can carry on speaking). To be then offered this as an example of a none-Liberal group being a ‘Godly community’, led in all things by feverous bible reading and worship songs even while at the same time with their other hand, they can do terribly un.. un… well, very hostile things towards their friends in delicate times… it was almost poetic. I’d say energies spent on maintaining unity could be better placed looking inwards to start off with – join me on the Biblical Interpretations debate later maybe. Ooh Yeah – I got a bit bad ass on you there. Take it.

The evening went onto time with Caleb, which was long overdue and really helpful. We talked till about 3am and covered a few of the things that I’m finding really hard right now – I do miss the old days.

The train journey up to Manchester was a disaster due to overhead cables collapsing on the Manchester-London route. The train journey home went just fine. I’m not having great luck with trains at the moment but I’m averaging a 1:1 ratio of good:bad.

Till next time, be good,
__
Phil